![]() ![]() The conversion time is certainly significant, but given the file weight gains, it overrides the issue of conversion time which for me is not important, as I let the conversion work in the background while I do other things on the computer and at night the conversion does not bother me, as my computer does not make noise even at high loads. The options available by libsvtav1 in FFmpeg do not allow me to get the result I want, I have either small files, but of mediocre quality or good quality files, but of enormous weight.īy passing the video tracks to SvtAv1EncApp, I get the weight gains I mentioned earlier in this post and the quality of the video tracks is very good. There is only in smaller format (512x280) where I have a loss of 5,5 % in file size compared to H265. ![]() In DVD format (720 × 576) I gain another 20% in file size compared to H265. ![]() under video i says 1080p (HEVC Main 10) (hw) 1080p (H264) - Transcode (HW). In 720p I gain 30 to 45% in file size compared to H265. using ffmpeg using nvidia hardware hevc(x265) encoding. Even for resolutions lower than 1080p, there is one big advantage, and that is the file weight. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |